PDF Publication Title:
Text from PDF Page: 110
110 6.2. EPOCH DEPENDENT ALGORITHM Proof of lemma 24. Consider any epoch f where f < e and any one of its phase two quorums Q where Q ∈ Qf2 . Prove that D[Q] ̸= nil. There are two mechanisms by which the revision C quorum intersection requirement with Q may be satisfied. Consider the case that an acceptor has promised in e with the proposal (g, w) for some epoch g where g ≥ f and for some value w. D[Q] will be set to either no or w, depending on whether additional proposals for epochs ≥ f and with different value have been received (Algorithm 20, lines 8-11). Consider the case that an acceptor a ∈ Q has promised in e with the proposal (g, w) for some epoch g and some value w. Consider the case that (g, w) = nil. D[Q] will be set to no (Algorithm 20, lines 4-5). Consider the case that (g, w) ̸= nil. Duetothetotalorderingofepochs,eithergPDF Image | Distributed consensus
PDF Search Title:
Distributed consensusOriginal File Name Searched:
UCAM-CL-TR-935.pdfDIY PDF Search: Google It | Yahoo | Bing
Cruise Ship Reviews | Luxury Resort | Jet | Yacht | and Travel Tech More Info
Cruising Review Topics and Articles More Info
Software based on Filemaker for the travel industry More Info
The Burgenstock Resort: Reviews on CruisingReview website... More Info
Resort Reviews: World Class resorts... More Info
The Riffelalp Resort: Reviews on CruisingReview website... More Info
CONTACT TEL: 608-238-6001 Email: greg@cruisingreview.com (Standard Web Page)