PDF Publication Title:
Text from PDF Page: 013
G Model POETIC 1239 No. of Pages 13 12 M. Airoldi et al. / Poetics xxx (2015) xxx–xxx listeners to classify musical contents (see Fabbri, 2003), while avoiding the risk of naturalising conventional genre categories (see DiMaggio, 1987: 441). Acknowledgments In addition to the Editor and the anonymous referees, we would like to thank Alex van Venrooij and Rens Wilderom for their helpful support with this article. This research received no specific grant from any funding agency in the public, commercial, or not-for-profit sectors. References Baek, Y. M. (2015). Relationship between cultural distance and cross-cultural music video consumption on YouTube. Social Science Computer Review, 33(6), 730–748. Baluja, S., Seth, R., Sivakumar, D., Jing, Y., Yagnik, J., Kumar, S., et al. (2008). Video suggestion and discovery for YouTube: taking random walks through the view graph. In proceedings of the 17th international conference on world wide web895–904. Baym, N., & Boyd, D. (2012). Socially mediated publicness: an introduction. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media, 56(3), 320–329. Beer, D. (2009). Power through the algorithm? Participatory web cultures and the technological unconscious. New Media & Society, 11(6), 985–1002. http:// dx.doi.org/10.1177/1461444809336551. Beer, D. (2013). Genre, boundary drawing and the classificatory imagination. Cultural Sociology, 7(2), 145–160. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1749975512473461. Bendersky, M., Garcia-Pueyo, L., Harmsen, J., Josifovski, V., & Lepikhin, D. (2014). Up Next: Retrieval Methods for Large Scale Related Video Suggestion Categories and Subject Descriptors. KDD’14. Blondel, V. D., Guillaume, J., Lambiotte, R., & Lefebvre, E. (2008). Fast unfolding of communities in large networks. In J. Stat. Mech.1–12. Bolton, G. E., Katok, E., & Ockenfels, A. (2004). How effective are electronic reputation mechanisms? An experimental investigation. Management Science, 50 (11), 1587–1602. Bourdieu, P. (1993). In R. Johnson (Ed.), The field of cultural production: essays on art and literatureNew York: Columbia University Press. Boyd, D., & Crawford, K. (2012). Critical questions for big data information. Communication & Society, 15(5), 662–679. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/ 1369118X.2012.678878. Browne, K. (2005). Snowball sampling: using social networks to research non-heterosexual women. International Journal of Social Research Methodology, 8, 47–70. Cayari, C. (2011). The YouTube effect: how YouTube has provided new ways to consume, create, and share music. International Journal of Education & the Arts, 12(6), 1–28. Celma, O. (2010). Music recommendation and discovery: the long tail, long fail, and long play in the digital music space. Heidelberg, Dordrecht, London, New York: Springer. Cheney-Lippold, J. (2011). A new algorithmic identity: soft biopolitics and the modulation of control theory. Culture & Society, 28(6), 164–181. http://dx.doi. org/10.1177/0263276411424420. Cheng, X., Dale, C., & Liu, J. (2008). Statistics and social network of youtube videos. IWQoS, 2008, 229–238. Coleman, E. G. (2010). Ethnographic approaches to digital media. Annual Review of Anthropology, 39(1), 487–505. http://dx.doi.org/10.1146/annurev. anthro.012809.104945. Crossley, N. (2008). Pretty connected: the social network of the early UK punk movement theory. Culture & Society, 25(6), 89–116. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/ 0263276408095546. Dahlhaus, C. (2004). Trivial music and aesthetic judgement. In C. J. Washburne, & M. Derno (Eds.), Bad music: the music we love to hate (pp. 262–277).New York & London: Routledge. Davidson, J., Liebald, B., & Liu, J. (2010). The YouTube video recommendation system. Proc. ACM RecSys.293–296. DeNora, T. (2000). Music in everyday life. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511489433. DiMaggio, P. (1987). Classification in art. American Sociological Review, 52(4), 440–455. Evans-Pritchard, E. E. (1940). The Nuer.. Oxford: Clarendon Press. Fabbri, F. (1982). A theory of musical genres: two applications. In P. Horn, & D. Tagg (Eds.), Popular music perspectives (pp. 52–81).Exeter: International Association for the Study of Popular Music. Fabbri, F. (2003). Taboo listening. Background listening and music composition conference. Frith, S. (1996). Performing rites: on the value of popular music. Cambridge, MA: Harvard: University Press. Gaul, W., & Klages, R. (2013). A hierarchical clustering approach to modularity maximization. In A. Lausen, Berthold, Van den Poel, Dirk, & Ultsch (Eds.), Algorithms from and for nature and life. studies in classification, data analysis, and knowledge organization (pp. 79–86).Springer. Giglietto, F., Rossi, L., & Bennato, D. (2012). The open laboratory: limits and possibilities of using facebook, twitter, and YouTube as a research data source. Journal of Technology in Human Services, 30(3–4), 145–159. Goffman, E. (1974). Frame analysis: an essay of the organization of experience. New York: Harper and Row. Green, J., & Burgess, J. (2009). YouTube: online video and participatory culture. Cambridge: Polity Press. Hall, S., & Jefferson, T. (1976). Resistance through rituals: youth subcultures in post-war Britain. London: Hutchinson. Hallinan, B., & Striphas, T. (2014). Recommended for you: the Netflix Prize and the production of algorithmic culture. New Media & Society. http://dx.doi.org/ 10.1177/1461444814538646. Holt, F. (2007). Genre in popular music. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. Holt, F. (2011). Is music becoming more visual? Online video content in the music industry. Visual Studies, 26(1), 50–61. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/ 1472586X.2011.548489. Krippendorff, K. (2013). Content analysis: an introduction to its methodology, 3rd ed. London: Sage. Lambiotte, R., & Ausloos, M. (2005). Uncovering collective listening habits and music genres in bipartite networks. Physical Review E72, 72(6), 066107. Lena, J., & Peterson, R. (2008). Classification as culture: types and trajectories of music genres. American Sociological Review, 73(5), 697–718. Marres, N. (2012). The redistribution of methods: on intervention in digital social research, broadly conceived. The Sociological Review, 60, 139–165. http:// dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-954x.2012.02121.x. Middleton, R. (1990). Studying popular music. Buckingham and Philadelphia: Open University Press. Newman, M. (2006). Modularity and community structure in networks. Proceedings of the National Academy of Science, 103(23), 8577–8582. Peterson, R. A. (2005). Problems in comparative research: the example of omnivorousness. Poetics, 33(5–6), 257–282. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j. poetic.2005.10.002. Prior, N. (2014). The plural iPod: a study of technology in action. Poetics, 42, 22–39. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.poetic.2013.11.001. Ricci, F., Rokach, L., & Shapira, B. (2011). In F. Ricci, L. Rokach, B. Shapira, & P. B. Kantor (Eds.), Recommender systems handbookBoston, MA: Springer US. http:// dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-85820-3_1. Rimmer, M. (2012). Beyond omnivores and univores: the promise of a concept of musical habitus. Cultural Sociology, 6(3), 299–318. http://dx.doi.org/ 10.1177/1749975511401278. Please cite this article in press as: M. Airoldi, et al., Follow the algorithm: An exploratory investigation of music on YouTube, Poetics (2016), http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.poetic.2016.05.001PDF Image | Follow the algorithm: An exploratory investigation of music on YouTube
PDF Search Title:
Follow the algorithm: An exploratory investigation of music on YouTubeOriginal File Name Searched:
AiroldiBeraldoGandini2016Preprint.pdfDIY PDF Search: Google It | Yahoo | Bing
Cruise Ship Reviews | Luxury Resort | Jet | Yacht | and Travel Tech More Info
Cruising Review Topics and Articles More Info
Software based on Filemaker for the travel industry More Info
The Burgenstock Resort: Reviews on CruisingReview website... More Info
Resort Reviews: World Class resorts... More Info
The Riffelalp Resort: Reviews on CruisingReview website... More Info
CONTACT TEL: 608-238-6001 Email: greg@cruisingreview.com (Standard Web Page)